1) If htm/rtf version is UC: Before you proof the attached htm or rtf, I'd suggest you load the B&W tiff in Finereader 10. You may even get fewer errors. I loaded the Grey tiff for OCR and then saved to B&W CCITT Group 4; some of these tiffs were later run through Scan Taylor. After I learnt of it. Besides how anyone can even claim to proof a scan without the image and text side by side is beyond me. http://scantailor.sourceforge.net/ Tips: when using Scan taylor v0.9.8 (or later) ALWAYS: - check every page split, ST almost always gets a few wrong if scan was rotated, almost never if not. Weird. - check each page 'select content', frequently misses distant page numbers at end of chapter among other things. - make use of widest/tallest, a single oversized area will affect all page sizes. (view the ST 'how to use' video) - found it quickest to first align all images with page numbers, either center top or bottom. Then individually reposition the Intro pages, first/last chapter page and appendices where necessary. Again sorting by tallest helps speed things along. Although it takes longer to process the tifs than to do the scan, the improved ocr results, neater and smaller tif size make it worth the little extra effort, at least I think so. For a 247 pg/20 min scan, takes ST about 30 min and FR 15 min to produce the tif and UC rtf\htm. (on my busted xp system, if it's much faster for you, congratulations) All blank pages in original scan retained, only 4kb each. Displaying the thumbnails in 10 columns in FR is a quick & easy way to check for missed pages. 2) If ebook version is v0.9: some text is obscured by page flakes (an old book), two pages squeezed at spine or a missed page flap (old bookmark or careless book flip). When noticed I added the missing text from the DT rather than rescan page. I'm lazy, so sue me. More recent PP's will have a txt file named 'chk pg x,y,z' which was a file I put in ST's out folder to remind myself which pages needed a DT check, for whenever I got around to the OCR. FR v10 save settings: Set for me to correct the UC into what I refer to as v1.0, What exactly that is doesn't matter as there was/is no real standard. RTF: Retain Layout > Exact copy, checked > keep headers & footers, keep line breaks, highlight uncertain characters. This file intended as a quick visual check for ocr errors, format to match original as closely as possible, in case I need to refer to the DT HTM: Retain Layout > Flexible layout, checked > keep pictures, custom> 200 dpi (good enough for drawings, photos are trimed and saved as scaned, for someone better at photoshop than me) This file intended as final output, tweaked with any OCR corrections spotted from the tif/rtf to make a V1.0 foi