1)	If htm/rtf version is UC:
	
Before you proof the attached htm or rtf, I'd suggest you load the B&W tiff in Finereader 10 for a fresh start. You may even get less errors than me. I loaded the Grey tiff for OCR and then saved to B&W CCITT Group 4, some of these tiffs were later run through Scantaylor. After I learnt of it. Besids how anyone can proof a scan without the tif and text side by side is beyond me.

http://scantailor.sourceforge.net/

Tips: when using Scan taylor v0.9.8 ALWAYS:
- check every page split, ST always gets a few wrong.
- check each page for select content, frequently misses page numbers at end of chapter among other things.
- make use of widest/tallest pages, a oversized area will effect all page sizes.


It takes longer to process the tifs than to do the scan, but the orc results, and reduced tif size are worth the little extra effort, at least I think so. For a 20 min scan, takes me about 30 min to produce the htm and tif/rtf proofpacks.

All blank pages in original scan retained, only 4kb each, and let displaying the thumbnails in 10 columns an easy way to check for missed pages.

2)	If ebook version is v0.9:

some text is obscured by page flakes (an old book), two pages squezed at spine or a missed page flap (an old, real bookmark). When noticed I added the missing text from the DT rather than rescan page.I'm lazy, so sue me.

More recent scans will have a txt file named 'chk pg x,y,z' which was a file i put in the tiff folder to remind myself which pages needed a DT check, for whenever i got around to the OCR.

foi