scan nfo, some version included with each tif:

1)	If htm/rtf version is UC:
	
Before you proof the attached htm or rtf, I'd suggest you load the B&W tiff in Finereader 10. You may even get less errors. I loaded the Grey tiff for OCR and then saved to B&W CCITT Group 4, some of these tiffs were later run through Scan Taylor. After I learnt of it. Besides how anyone can proof a scan without the tif and text side by side is beyond me.

http://scantailor.sourceforge.net/

Tips: when using Scan taylor v0.9.8 ALWAYS:
- check every page split, ST almost always gets a few wrong.
- check each page 'select content', frequently misses page numbers at end of chapter among other things.
- make use of widest/tallest page, a oversized area will effect all page sizes. (view the ST 'how to use' video)
- found it quickest to first align all images with page numbers, either center top or bottom. and individually reposition the Intro pages, appendix and first/last chaper page where necessary.

Allthough it takes longer to process the tifs than to do the scan, the improved ocr results, neater and smaller tif size make it worth the little extra effort, at least I think so. For a 20 min scan, takes ST about 30 min and FR 15 min to produce the UC.htm and tif/rtf proofpacks.

All blank pages in original scan retained, only 4kb each, and displaying the thumbnails in 10 columns is a quick & easy way to check for missed pages.

2)	If ebook version is v0.9:

some text is obscured by page flakes (an old book), two pages squezed at spine or a missed page flap (old bookmark). When noticed I added the missing text from the DT rather than rescan page. I'm lazy, so sue me.

More recent PP's will have a txt file named 'chk pg x,y,z' which was a file I put in ST's out folder to remind myself which pages needed a DT check, for whenever I got around to the OCR.